Paul Goggins: The targets, which have been set for 2007-08, are based on the strategic aim and objectives of the Agency as set out in Section 4 of its Corporate and Business Plan. The targets are in line with the Department's policy of seeking to improve the service provided to the Agency's clients in terms of both quality and value for money and I am satisfied that they present a demanding challenge for the Agency. A copy of the Corporate and Business Plan will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses.
	The targets are as follows:
	Quality Targets
	1. A total of 95 per cent. of the service provided by the Agency's Client Support staff to external clients to be regarded as satisfactory, of which 35 per cent. of the service to be regarded as either very good or excellent.
	2. A total of 95 per cent. of the service provided by the Agency's Project Management staff to external clients to be regarded as satisfactory, of which 35 per cent. of the service to be regarded as either very good or excellent.
	3. A total of 95 per cent. of the service provided by the Agency's Specialist Engineering staff to external clients to be regarded as satisfactory, of which 35 per cent. of the service to be regarded as either very good or excellent.
	Throughput/Service Delivery Targets
	4. Issue all Medical Device/Equipment Alerts with an Immediate Action level of urgency designated initiated by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) within three working days on receipt of final MHRA Alert (provided that no further consultation is involved).
	5. Issue all Medical Device/Equipment Alerts with an "Action" level of urgency designation initiated by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) within five working days on receipt of final MHRA Alert (provided that no further consultation is involved).
	6. Issue a High Voltage Alert within four workingdays from receipt and assessment of an applicable Electricity Network Association Notice or other safety information in relation to High Voltage equipment installed in the HPSS.
	7. Complete a review of HPSS Catering Operations by November 2007 and take forward the development of a HPSS Catering Strategy by March 2008.
	8. Complete an assessment of the HPSS position against "Essence of Care" in regard to the Council of Europe Statement on hospital food nutrition by 30 November 2007 and lead the exploration of appropriate initiatives to improve nutritional standards by 31 March 2008.
	9. Develop a regional strategy for laundry and linen services by 30 November 2007.
	10. Publish a Carbon and Energy Savings Strategy in the Health and Personal Social Services Estate by31 March 2008.
	Resource and Financial Management Targets
	11. Ensure the Agency meets its commitment to "Fit for Purpose" and DRC reductions and its target of a reduction of 19 posts by 31 March 2008.
	12. Ensure that the Agency lives within its running cost allocation for the year.
	13. Demonstrate that the full costs of the Agency are recouped, on a notional basis, through the Service Level Agreement with the Department.

Alistair Darling: Further to my statement to the House on Wednesday 18 April 2007, Official Report, columns 301-02, I am now able to announce the terms of reference for the inquiry that I have asked Mr. Michael Redfern QC to carry out. They are as follows.
	(a) Having regard to the provisions of the Human Tissue Act 1961, the Coroners' Rules 1984, the Coroners' Act 1988 and predecessor legislation, to inquire into the circumstances in which, between1961 and 1992, organs/tissue were removed from 65 individuals, and were sent to and analysed at Sellafield.
	(b) In particular, to establish so far as practicable:
	(i) when, where, by whom and by what means the taking of organs/tissue was requested and authorised;
	(ii) whether the taking of organs/tissue was based on informed consent by the family and/or surviving relatives;
	(iii) the purpose to be achieved by the retention and analysis of the organs/tissue removed; the generic results of analysis; and the identity of all publications in which the results were presented and commented upon;
	(iv) whether the families or surviving relatives were informed of the results of the analysis, or the identity of the relevant publications;
	(v) when and by whom the retention, storage, transportation, analysis, reporting and disposal of the organs/tissue was authorised;
	(vi) the circumstances in which the organs/tissue were retained, stored, transported, analysed, reported upon and disposed of;
	(vii) the general purpose to be served by such retention, storage, analysis and publication of the results;
	(viii) when this activity ceased, and the circumstances in which it ceased.
	(c) To consider such other issues in connection with the above matters as the Secretary of State may direct.
	(d) To report to the Secretary of State as soon as possible.
	(e) To make recommendations.
	Since my statement to the House, the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) and the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) have begun to examine their records to identify if tests on autopsy tissues were carried out at any of the sites for which they are, or have been responsible, other than Sellafield. The UKAEA tell me that they believe such work was carried out at Harwell, at least until the early 1980s, and possibly at other UKAEA sites, potentially involving work related to individuals who had not been employed at nuclear sites. The AWE believes that there could have been additional testing on their employees. In light of this information, and in line with what I told the House last week, I have therefore asked Michael Redfern QC to make this additional information part of his considerations.